X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Oleksandr Gavenko Subject: Re: question on backup Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:26:29 +0300 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <4EA9071D.30409@cs.cmu.edu> <4EA93FB6.9030501@cornell.edu> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A39C92B61@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> <20111027141824.GA12195@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4EA9CDDA.20600@cs.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4EA9CDDA.20600@cs.cmu.edu> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam 28.10.2011 0:32, Paul Allen Newell пишет: > On 10/27/2011 7:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Is there some reason why you wouldn't just use cygcheck for this? >> > Chris: I didn't know about cygcheck and had blinders on during my search > as I was looking for a data file rather than a utility. Just read the > docs, test drove it per docs, and its definitely better than what I was > originally looking for. Thanks! > $ cygcheck -c Cygwin Package Information Package Version Status _update-info-dir 00989-1 OK alternatives 1.3.30c-10 OK aspell 0.60.5-1 OK aspell-doc 0.60.5-1 OK ...... ....... ........ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple