X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4EA32AAD.6070701@cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:42:21 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Question about Cygwin's select() References: <4E9ED08B.3080503@cornell.edu> <20111019144910.GB16351@calimero.vinschen.de> <20111019162219.GB1085@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E9F09AE.7090609@cornell.edu> <4E9F2FE1.7050003@cornell.edu> <4EA01079.5010303@cornell.edu> <20111021094428.GA2979@calimero.vinschen.de> <4EA1812B.4060503@cornell.edu> <4EA1D016.5050605@cornell.edu> <4EA292F4.4090503@cornell.edu> In-Reply-To: <4EA292F4.4090503@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 10/22/2011 5:55 AM, Ken Brown wrote: > I'm wrong. I've been focusing too much on the select interruption. This > is actually harmless and is correctly treated by emacs the same as a > select timeout. It doesn't explain or solve the original gdb problem. > Sorry for the noise. I was finally able to make a testcase, showing that the problem I mentioned in the first post of this thread has nothing to do with emacs or select. It's a Cygwin/gdb problem. I've reported it in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/msg00445.html Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple