Message-ID: <4E8EBFEA.4010407@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:01:30 +0200
From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.9 Missing SIGPIPE?
References: <4E833CB4.3060004@lysator.liu.se> <4E8B0FC6.9050600@lysator.liu.se> <4E8B116D.3030905@gmail.com> <20111004140927.GC20825@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E8B193D.4000700@gmail.com> <20111004163934.GA30117@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E8DF37F.8070103@gmail.com> <20111006192949.GE22971@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20111006192949.GE22971@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 10/6/2011 9:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I understand what you say you did.  There was no reason to reexplain.
>
> Once again, I don't understand why Cygwin's current implementation is
> inadequate to handle the problem that you are seeing.  You can assert
> that it must be because Cygwin does not explicitly send a SIGHUP on
> close and you may be right but, again, I don't see why the current
> implementation, which should amount to the same thing, does not work.
>
> Yes.  It isn't explicitly implemented but it shouldn't matter.
>
> cgf

OK, we are on the same page.

If I find some time, I will try to build a test case for it.
But time is scarce and this is not a priority

thanks
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple