X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SARE_SUB_MINUTES,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Andrew Schulman <schulman.andrew@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject: Re: date is off of system clock by about 9 minutes
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:34:38 -0400
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <24u287pde8aam11ap6nba6i3n92do8p6e9@4ax.com>
References: <7f11875iun9ve00e3d598kneo19s7m0v23@4ax.com> <jr6187dh6mm85b7t7il8m88dkd2icnptes@4ax.com> <loom.20110926T222920-681@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive: encrypt
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> Andrew Schulman writes:
> > > Both 'date' and 'ls' show times that are ahead of the system clock by about 9
> > > minutes, 24 seconds.
> > 
> > I just ran rebaseall for other reasons (bzr again), and now the problem has
> > disappeared.
> 
> Check the archives for why the problem occurs; it's been brought up before.  But
> stopping all Cygwin processes, as one does for rebaseall, causes 'date' and
> system clock to be in sync again in new Cygwin processes afterwards.  So you've
> coincidentally done the exact fix required.  Be happy.

Thanks.  It took a while but I found the explanation at
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-03/msg00838.html.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple