To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: jojelino <jojelino@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Relocation patch for cygwin
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:30:57 +0900
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <j5p2me$ik4$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4D430530.7050401@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <j5ip1t$qhd$1@dough.gmane.org> <4E7FCC4C.4090609@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:8.0a2) Gecko/20110925 Thunderbird/8.0a2
In-Reply-To: <4E7FCC4C.4090609@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 2011-09-26 AM 9:50, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Well, the libiconv distributed as an official cygwin package *SHOULD*
> not have been built with --enable-relocation, so only a subset of the
> "relocation" code *OUGHT* to be involved -- just enough for any calls to
> relocate() to return the passed-in string IIRC.
>
> However...it appears that I MAY have mistakenly uploaded the version I
> built WITH relocation enabled (which I generally do for testing
> purposes, just to make sure it still works).  I'll need to double check.
>
there is '-DENABLE_RELOCATABLE=1' in 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/tree/gettext-runtime/intl/Makefile.in 
which cannot be affected by `--enable-relocation`. it would have been 
-DENABLE_RELOCATABLE=@RELOCATABLE@ i think.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple