X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4E7627E5.5090402@cygwin.com> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:18:29 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Dealing with Symlinks References: <32489424.post@talk.nabble.com> In-reply-to: <32489424.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 9/18/2011 9:28 AM, tedthetool wrote: > My friends tells me that this is because cygwin doesn't deal with the > symlinks present in C header files. How do I remedy this? You'll need to get more specific about this assertion if you and your friends want to talk about this issue in the context of symlinks. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple