To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Heiko Elger <heiko_elger@arburg.com>
Subject: Re: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable: address space is already occupied
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:13:30 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <loom.20110810T130853-438@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20110810T063856-153@post.gmane.org> <20110810050651.GA23017@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <loom.20110810T130205-99@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Heiko Elger writes:

> 
> Christopher Faylor writes:
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:51:32AM +0000, Heiko Elger wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I know there are lots of such postings "Resource temporarily unavailable"
> > >But using lates snapshot (2011-08-03): there are changes by C. Faylor 
printing
> > >cause of fork failure.
> > 
> > I can see I'm going to regret exposing these errors.  They have been there
> > for a couple of months but they were strace only.  I just made them more
> > visible.
> > 
> > This.  Is a recording.
> > 
> > rebaseall and peflagsall should fix the problem.
> > 
> 
> After rebaseall and peflagsall, I will get the following errors while running
> "make -j ...."
> 
> *** snip snip snip *****
> abnormal program termination
> C:\TEMP\make556888.sh: fork failed: no child processes [1]
> *** snip snip snip *****
> 

I forgot, is it possible a error of make?
I use old make 3.80 (binary from cygwin 1.5.x) ..
.. and I do not run rebase/peflags against it.
Is it allowed to run old make (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin
/128011)

best regards
Heiko


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple