X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:34:34 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: bzr completely broken? Message-ID: <20110803103434.GC1791@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4E3762DF.3040601@cygwin.com> <3euf37dhcv87d2ahbsmnq0f456pkob1vvo@4ax.com> <20110802132559.GA9043@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110802144015.GB8652@calimero.vinschen.de> <8fjg3756bfbgelfli94dmqhat97k5p5bmp@4ax.com> <20110803071832.GG5647@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Aug 3 10:48, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > . . . > > > We're working on a new release of rebase anyway. This new release > > checks for writability and prints just a warning without stopping > > dead in its track: > > > > /usr/bin/foo.dll: skipped because not writable > > > Otherwise, what we can do is to open the file with > > FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS. This would allow you to rebase DLLs > > without write permissions if you have admin privileges. > > A combination of the two would be best, I think. That is, try > FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS, so for Admins it will work, and if _that_ > fails print the message. I agree. I checked that in. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple