X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Heiko Elger <heiko_elger@arburg.com>
Subject: Re: Slow performance Win7/64
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:52:47 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <loom.20110729T144701-436@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20110727T120025-601@post.gmane.org> <j0tc8u$slo$1@dough.gmane.org> <loom.20110729T103121-380@post.gmane.org> <20110729092602.GB19240@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hello,

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> 
> The slowdown of the code was the result of a patch which was supposed
> to fix a potential race condition.  Jojelino's patch looks nice, but
> it might reintroduce a new race.  Handle with care.
Oops - what king of race condition do you mean.

OK - that's a new information for me.
So the current slow implementation is a workaround for another race condition.

So - is there no other way for fixing that race contion!

Is there another implememtaion for fixing the slow signaling without getting a
new race condition.

Heiko




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple