X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: jojelino Subject: Re: Slow performance Win7/64 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:42:47 +0900 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <20110729092602.GB19240@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:7.0a2) Gecko/20110728 Thunderbird/7.0a2 In-Reply-To: <20110729092602.GB19240@calimero.vinschen.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 2011-07-29 오후 6:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> I've already recognize one positive side effect: >> The CTRL-C Handler works now even faster. >> With unpatched cygwin1.dll there was a realy long delay, after pressing CTRL-C. >> Can you agree this too? >> I agree sincerely. > The slowdown of the code was the result of a patch which was supposed > to fix a potential race condition. Jojelino's patch looks nice, but > it might reintroduce a new race. Handle with care. The process are failing to fork with rare rate. (with make -j 10 command) although i'm using cygwin with CFLAGS=-O4 -fomit-frame-pointer and disabling all {cygheap,....}_CFLAGS. but in most occasions it works fine. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple