Message-ID: <4DDB8036.3090405@ece.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 05:53:58 -0400
From: Ryan Johnson <ryanjohn@ece.cmu.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: CYGWIN=tty round 2
References: <20110522211906.GA13428@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <1306119201.4572.4.camel@YAAKOV04> <4DDAEBEC.6030704@ece.cmu.edu> <20110524062212.GA13144@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20110524062212.GA13144@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 24/05/2011 2:22 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 07:21:16PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> On 22/05/2011 10:53 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 17:19 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> I don't think we saw anyone step forward with a valid reason why they
>>>> needed to use CYGWIN=tty over something like "mintty".
>>>>
>>>> I've summarized the thread where Corinna asked why people used
>>>> CYGWIN=tty over CYGWIN=notty below.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any showstoppers here so unless people can provide specific
>>>> examples of how this change would cause hardwhip, we'll be removing
>>>> CYGWIN=tty in a snapshot near you soon.
>>> I could add XWin:
>>>
>>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9763
>>>
>>> And once again, using mintty is a solution.
>>>
>>> Since mintty is the solution to so many of these scenarios, shouldn't
>>> we make it the default terminal (IOW add mintty to Base and replace the
>>> Cygwin.bat shortcut with mintty's)?  The status quo just encourages
>>> people to use a deficient terminal without any idea that a better one
>>> exists.
>> I would be happy to see mintty as the default.  Since discovering it I
>> essentially stopped using X because xterm was my main reason for firing
>> it up.
>>
>> However...  isn't there some dire warning that gdb only will ever work
>> properly (some of the time) from within a vanilla console window?
>> Something to do with ^C handling?
>>
>> Mind you, I'd love that restriction to be lifted, but it sounded pretty
>> hard and fast the last few times the topic came up.  On the other hand,
>> most casual cygwin users won't be needing gdb often, if ever, so that
>> might not be enough reason to keep the console over mintty.
> Can we PLEASE stay on topic?
>
> This has nothing to do with CYGWIN=tty.  If gdb didn't work in mintty it
> wouldn't work with CYGWIN=tty either.
Sorry... I got distracted by the mintty-as-default tangent.

Back on topic, I have never used CYGWIN=tty (I kept forgetting to set it 
even when directed to do so by various inaccurate how-tos out ther) and 
would not miss it.

Ryan


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple