X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4DB8409E.2030004@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:13:18 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: untarring symlinks with ../ fails randomly
References: <BANLkTikh9rCN2GRwY3eW20H0isffN5fMUg@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=GZbtLmK-Sr06-M=5xXVFzPCi82w@mail.gmail.com>	<20110424121145.GB30696@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20110425T165316-628@post.gmane.org>	<20110426074325.GP3324@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20110426T170653-639@post.gmane.org>	<20110426152226.GA22801@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<20110426155346.GA19578@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20110427T161737-566@post.gmane.org>	<4DB83C35.8040808@redhat.com> <BANLkTikDcVCNGNoEAF-5q66KzROY9FB_2Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikDcVCNGNoEAF-5q66KzROY9FB_2Q@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFF8370C4E6D3775730F6D554"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

--------------enigFF8370C4E6D3775730F6D554
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 04/27/2011 10:10 AM, David Boyce wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I think the patch should remain cygwin-only, and not go upstream.
>=20
> What about native Windows builds of GNU tar such as GnuWin32? Wouldn't
> they benefit from a (suitably conditionalized) patch too?

No, because they don't use ctime the way that cygwin1.dll uses ctime.
They probably have other hacks in their port of tar to work around lack
of POSIX features that cygwin1.dll is emulating.

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


--------------enigFF8370C4E6D3775730F6D554
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNuECeAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqbpkH/2svOIQdxGBXHlyCFfWbAd0n
g6i7LAOM/wVtVnOabC/cJZcEAtL4dBrLHuGD3wpNIRwHkOWGcsirsKAXglRK3w7c
VyLXh3RDxxasCUSm9q525UjQiAtTtOWjyOKQPlWqBheW4uogonukmh1WKlV7V5hQ
5FTH5cQVmi37nIxeqRWquE7D3uZVUqJGF/HpcRkjC78/Yr/pP+mlnxhcaovACPKF
tK+CnsQPHiaXj0NHOvem4EMyZbwzZGw6oNIWsrjIk48EcsBPhu/bQeHt9Lkip490
rbp7A+lxQEZCfIVnoQHDMMJL/PG2Citkyw9upN65VSFAefujKVKsX7bDlXFz2N4=
=yEuO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigFF8370C4E6D3775730F6D554--
