X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-SMTPAuthUserID: ab2325 Message-ID: <2AAA0D500DE14145BC643B30E8505C2D@cit.wayne.edu> From: "Lee Maschmeyer" To: Subject: /etc/apache.new? Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:18:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Hi folks, I recently had to reinstall Cygwin. 900 apps showed up as incomplete in the cygcheck -srv output. Go figure; I obviously did something wrong somewhere. :-) Anyway, I'm getting the wrinkles out. There are no more incomplete packages. In looking at /etc I see both apache and apache.new directories. diff -r shows that the contents are identical. Will cygcheck get mad if I rename apache.new to apache, or are both supposed to be there? Thanks, -- Lee Maschmeyer Wayne State University Computing Center 5925 Woodward, #281 Detroit MI 48202 USA -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple