X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: From: Karl M To: Subject: RE: NT4? Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:47:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110331203416.GB2606@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20110331203416.GB2606@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:16 +0200 > From: corinna-cygwin > Subject: NT4? > > Is anybody here still using Cygwin on Windows NT4 on a daily basis? I'm > asking because we're planning to drop NT4 support entirely and I would > like to know if there are lots of people who would be very sad if that > happens. > No...Haven't even used w2k in the last five years. =20 At some point, would there be any (significant) performance advantage to moving (some of the) platform differences to compile time? (Not for all of the applications, just for the Cygwin DLL and perhaps cygserver? =20 Thanks, =20 ...Karl=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple