Message-ID: <4D945A66.40206@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:41:42 +0200
From: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre-lists@laposte.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells
References: <4D93C65F.4020007@laposte.net> <1301539636.1416.2.camel@YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To: <1301539636.1416.2.camel@YAAKOV04>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com


Le 31/03/2011 04:47, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) a =C3=A9crit :
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>> /etc/shells is missing some shells :
>>
>> /bin/ash
>> /bin/csh
>> /bin/mksh
>> /usr/bin/ash
>> /usr/bin/csh
>> /usr/bin/mksh
>>
>> and maybe more ?
>
> ash is just a copy of dash, and csh is a symlink to tcsh.  However, you
> are certainly correct about adding mksh, possibly removing the obsolete
> pdksh in the process.

and then ? if a user prefer csh to tsch...
for memory, csh behave differently than tcsh, at least, command line=20
edition is disabled.

Regards,

Cyrille Lefevre
--=20
mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre-lists@laposte.net


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple