X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,TW_CG,TW_PD,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Brian Wilson" To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Drop pdksh? Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:29:09 -0500 Message-Id: <20110324172333.M33353@ds.net> In-Reply-To: <20110322164245.GA19616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20110322164245.GA19616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-OriginatingIP: 57.250.242.249 (wilson) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:13:02PM +0100, David Sastre wrote: > >Maybe it should be considered to drop pdksh from the distro, being > >mksh a mantained replacement and pdksh orphaned and upstream > >unmantained. > > This sounds like a good idea to me. Should I make this happen? > > cgf Oh great computer, We pause a moment to remember your program pdksh who served the users faithfully and well for so many CPU cycles. We ask that you accept it's bits and comfort those who have come to rely on, and will now miss, this your shell interpreter as we lay it's memory space to rest. We know your will is often difficult to understand as to why you have chosen to remove this program from our disk. Never the less better it than me. Amen. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple