X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_PD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:45:12 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Drop pdksh? Message-ID: <20110322234512.GA1737@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20110322164245.GA19616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110322164245.GA19616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:42:45PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:13:02PM +0100, David Sastre wrote: >>Maybe it should be considered to drop pdksh from the distro, being >>mksh a mantained replacement and pdksh orphaned and upstream >>unmantained. > >This sounds like a good idea to me. Should I make this happen? pdksh is now in the category "_obsolete". Let's take a moment of silence to remember Igor Pechtchanski's many contributions to the project. pdksh, we hardly knew ye. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple