X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D600C0A.9080305@etr-usa.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:29:30 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Please test latest developer snapshot References: <20110217120400.GB29762@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110217120400.GB29762@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 2/17/2011 5:04 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi crowd, rabble? angry mob? > - Reintroduce the ability to delete an empty directory which is the > current working directory of the same or another Cygwin process. I don't see that. Testcase: $ mkdir foo $ cd foo $ rmdir . rmdir: failed to remove `.': Invalid argument cd .. && rmdir foo does work. > - Core file access functions have been slightly redesigned to gain > performance. Hopefully file access got just a bit faster now... This is the one that explains the 2.5x faster cygport builds I reported during the "rm -rf sometimes fails" thread back in December, I'm guessing? This looks like a *huge* release, Corinna. I think you could get away with calling it 1.9.0, and nevermind how recent 1.7.0 was. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple