X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o-
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:26:24 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: chmod indicates success, but does not succeed
Message-ID: <20110216162623.GA10243@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <30931008.post@talk.nabble.com> <ije3dh$ovk$1@dough.gmane.org> <30932818.post@talk.nabble.com> <4D5ABE96.7000604@sbcglobal.net> <20110215180356.GB20118@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <30934365.post@talk.nabble.com> <20110215195733.GE6852@calimero.vinschen.de> <30936577.post@talk.nabble.com> <ijfoa0$e5l$2@dough.gmane.org> <20110216085734.GF6852@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110216085734.GF6852@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:57:34AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 16 00:45, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> On 02/15/11 19:40, hardya wrote:
>> >MSYS is described as a fork of cygwin that's specially suited to being used
>> >with win32.
>> How would MSYS be any more "specially suited to being used with
>> win32" than Cygwin itself, is it already "specially suited to being
>> used with win32"?!?
>
>Just a typo I guess.  s/win32/mingw32/

Actually, I had the same reaction as Andy at first.  Then I reparsed the line to
mean "pure win32 programs" and then it made more sense, even if it isn't strictly
true.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

