X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-48.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <4D532F7F.7010103@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:21:19 -0500
From: Gerry Reno <greno@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.7:  after upgrade lost ability to login via ssh
References: <4D51F868.6010000@verizon.net> <4D52131F.9060603@cygwin.com> <4D530D72.7000302@verizon.net> <4D531023.6070807@verizon.net> <4D5316A4.7080902@cygwin.com> <4D531B83.3080000@verizon.net> <4D5326B2.7010203@cygwin.com>
In-reply-to: <4D5326B2.7010203@cygwin.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 02/09/2011 06:43 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 2/9/2011 5:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 02/09/2011 05:35 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 2/9/2011 5:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 02/09/2011 04:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>>> On 02/08/2011 11:07 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/8/2011 9:14 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something else I just discovered after upgrading to 1.7.7 is that
>>>>>>> I now
>>>>>>> have lost the ability to login via ssh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have OpenSSH installed and running sshd as a service.  Both
>>>>>>> password
>>>>>>> and keys accepted.  But now neither means will work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        # ssh -i keypair1.pem   Administrator@MACHINE_IP
>>>>>>>        Last login: Fri Feb  4 17:19:26 2011 from
>>>>>>> LOCAL_CLIENT_MACHINE
>>>>>>>        Connection to MACHINE_IP closed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I increased verbosity but did not see anything obvious.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        # ssh -v -i keypair1.pem   Administrator@MACHINE_IP
>>>>>>>        OpenSSH_5.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8k-fips 25 Mar 2009
>>>>>>>        debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
>>>>>>>        debug1: Applying options for *
>>>>>>>        debug1: Connecting to MACHINE_IP [MACHINE_IP] port 22.
>>>>>>>        debug1: Connection established.
>>>>>>>        debug1: permanently_set_uid: 0/0
>>>>>>>        debug1: identity file keypair1.pem type -1
>>>>>>>        debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version
>>>>>>> OpenSSH_5.8
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does reverting OpenSSH to 5.7 make a difference?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Downgraded to 5.7:
>>>>>
>>>>>       bash-4.1$ sshd --version
>>>>>       sshd: unknown option -- -
>>>>>       OpenSSH_5.7p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>  From client:
>>>>>
>>>>>       ssh -i keypair1.pem   Administrator@MACHINE_IP
>>>>>       Last login: Wed Feb  9 12:54:08 2011 from LOCAL_CLIENT_IP
>>>>>       Connection to MACHINE_IP closed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.  Still have the same problem.  Connection is made but
>>>>> immediately
>>>>> closes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm suspecting this is related to running Cygwin 1.7.
>>>>
>>>> In looking back though some notes I started having bash shell problems
>>>> after upgrading from 1.5 to 1.7.
>>>>
>>>> Now on 1.7 if I try to run bash as a login shell it just gets "Bad
>>>> address" or segfault errors and immediately exits the shell which also
>>>> probably affects 'ssh'.
>>>>
>>>> I don't remember having any bash problems when I was running Cygwin
>>>> 1.5
>>>> on this machine.  My notes reflect screen copies showing bash able to
>>>> run as a login shell without any problem.
>>>
>>> Yep, that's the way we all run by default (see cygwin.bat).  I agree
>>> that if you're having problems getting bash to behave, it's best to
>>> focus
>>> on that issue first.  Your ssh problems may just be another symptom of
>>> the same thing.  How about sending cygcheck output
>>> (<http://cygwin.com/problems.html>)?  There may be something helpful in
>>> that which someone on the list might pick up on.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, ran a new cygcheck and attached it.
>
> OK, thanks.  What went wrong with the first installation?
>
> I notice that this is using TS.  Can you try experiment with this machine
> locally?  Or perhaps just try:
>
> <http://cygwin.com/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.setup-fails-on-ts>
>

I reduced DEP down to just Windows executables and dlls and then rebooted.

And it actually seemed to make the problem worse:

    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash-4.1$ (for p in $(ls /etc/profile.d/*.sh);do . $p;done)
    bash: /etc/profile.d/lapack0.sh: Bad address
    bash-4.1$


So DEP in is play here but sort of inverse from what I'd expect.  There
was no switch now to totally disable it.  I guess they want you to
fiddle with the registry to turn it all the way off.


Regards,
Gerry




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

