X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D513C14.9050703@users.sourceforge.net> References: <4D50A18B.9020009@users.sourceforge.net> <4D5125CE.9050406@users.sourceforge.net> <4D513C14.9050703@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:33:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 64-bit mingw compiler doesn't From: Csaba Raduly To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:50 PM, JonY wrote: > > Csaba: > After double checking, I see mingw64-x86_64-binutils as a requirement of > mingw64-x86_64-gcc-core. This should install binutils when you install > mingw-w64 gcc. Can you confirm that its not installed at all? > Whoops, my bad. I selected mingw64-x86_64-gcc instead of mingw64-x86_64-gcc-core, thinking it was some sort of umbrella package, failing to notice the "(source)" in the description. mingw64-x86_64-gcc-core does indeed depend on mingw64-x86_64-binutils. Csaba -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple