X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:46:36 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bad rebaseall interaction with new mingw Message-id: <20110110134636.GA3396@tishler.net> Mail-followup-to: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4D27AEF0.2000102@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Daniel, On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:10:19PM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, JonY wrote: > > IMHO rebaseall shouldn't be interacting with mingw dlls at all. > > Maybe it can check for dependencies on cygwin1.dll before rebasing? > > That's the point. The mingw DLLs need to be added to rebaseall's > filter pattern. The above is on my to do list. Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple