X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D27AEF0.2000102@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <AANLkTik2mdQs8PV-28s2Y2gFO9aW=RdO=+n4kaQBWHJ2@mail.gmail.com>	<4D27AEF0.2000102@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:10:19 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=S5NBOia=evytYKcTXP748dAUGN=zjADMjtust@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bad rebaseall interaction with new mingw
From: Daniel Colascione <dan.colascione@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, JonY <jon_y@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> IMHO rebaseall shouldn't be interacting with mingw dlls at all. Maybe it
> can check for dependencies on cygwin1.dll before rebasing?

That's the point. The mingw DLLs need to be added to rebaseall's filter pattern.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple