X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: uptime not reporting CPU usage on Windows 7 (Possibly only when running in VMWare) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:27:36 -0500 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <4D1CA8C0.9020806@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9pre) Gecko/20100821 Lightning/1.0b2 Lanikai/3.1.3pre In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 12/30/2010 06:05 PM, David Antliff wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 08:23, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> Well that sucks. Surely Windows has some means of reporting how busy the >> system is. uptime should use that. > But then they wouldn't be actual load averages where most > people/programs expected to see load averages. > > -- David Understood, but current real load averages be calculated? Besides wouldn't those people who expect to see real load averages (i.e. me!) be disappointed to only see 0's?!? IOW wouldn't even fake load averages be better than just always 0?!? -- Andrew DeFaria What was the best thing before sliced bread? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple