X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP: Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID: <4CDC5D8E.7040107@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:18:06 -0500
From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Installing new versions of vim doesn't uninstall old versions
References: <0C33B811BB93B3469F549ADBFA84414718BC77B4B2@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> <4CDC342B.7010308@cygwin.com> <ibhdkk$hi0$1@dough.gmane.org> <4CDC3CB5.4080300@cygwin.com> <20101111202901.GB26142@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20101111202901.GB26142@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 11/11/2010 3:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:57:57PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 11/11/2010 1:45 PM, Ren?? Berber wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2010 12:21 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2010 1:07 PM, Harrington, John wrote:
>>>>> I recently had a problem with vim that was the result of my unwittingly
>>>>> having two previous versions of vim in my /usr/bin.  Is it normal for the
>>>>> cygwin installer not to delete or clobber the previous versions?  I'm not
>>>>> sure what I did wrong, if anything, in updating my cygwin installation.
>>>>
>>>> Probably just a local glitch.  We haven't seen other reports of this,
>>>> though
>>>> that could just mean that no one else has noticed.
>>>
>>> Actually there are many reports, its not just vim, similar reports have
>>> been made about ssh, and checking for un-installed updates showed other
>>> cases.
>>>
>>> setup.exe just leaves<you-name-it>.exe.new (or .dll.new) and the change
>>> never happens.
>>>
>>> It may have been one of the old versions of setup, I don't know, some
>>> upgrades do happen correctly when an old one is still there, and left there.
>>
>> Yeah, maybe that explains this one too.  If John was using 'vim.exe' when he
>> did an update, then this could be the result.  But there is no vim-specific
>> issue here.
>
> And, of course, if anyone can provide a clearly-failing test case we'll fix
> the problem in setup.exe.

But this would make any existing work-arounds obsolete.  I think we need to
consider issues of backward bug compatibility before we blindly go fixing
'setup.exe'. ;-)

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple