X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk Message-ID: <4CD178DE.7010308@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:59:42 -0400 From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Is part of gcc3 missing? References: <21794C64742846718853014B087D0E6F@cit.wayne.edu> In-Reply-To: <21794C64742846718853014B087D0E6F@cit.wayne.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 11/3/2010 10:10 AM, Lee Maschmeyer wrote: > Hmm. Is that really the best approach unless absolutely necessary? "That > doesn't work so do something else" has always struck me as a less than ideal > approach to debugging. :-) Is it possible that caml could be repaired so it > doesn't depend on GCC4? I'm not sure "repaired" is the right word for this but I expect it would be possible to do this. I'm not sure anyone would consider it worth the time though. Presumably, some older release of ocaml would build with gcc-3, though I think you're heading in the wrong direction if you have as a goal to avoid build problems in the future. But if you are intent on going this route, you might find downgrading your ocaml packages to 3.08 will help side-step the issue. Given it's age, I would be surprised if it were built with gcc-4, though I didn't actually check that. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple