MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4CCA394F.6000106@cygwin.com>
References: <440383.4761.qm@web63703.mail.re1.yahoo.com>	<4CC72893.3030207@bopp.net>	<20101027020926.M25630@ds.net>	<4CC7942F.1030503@bopp.net>	<20101028121726.M63482@ds.net>	<4CC9DCB1.10108@cygwin.com>	<20101029022903.M10450@ds.net>	<4CCA394F.6000106@cygwin.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:48:55 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=pQKNi6fF3+DeSSE6Sa4RAcUwRWRS-szE40C5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SSH - Can't Login (3rd Post)
From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren@jcwren.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
<reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com> wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 10:37 PM, Brian Wilson wrote:
>>
>> The ssh command and its response are just a cut and paste of the bash
>> screen.
>> Trying to execute ssh -v ncc-1701 gives exactly the same results (note
>> there
>> is no -v option in the displayed list).
>
> $ ssh wilson@ncc-1701
> usage: ssh [-1246AaCfgKkMNnqsTtVvXxYy] [-b bind_address] [-c cipher_spec]=
...
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0^
> There it is. ;-)
>
> I really didn't doubt that you cut and paste the output once I looked at
> it but I'm glad you confirmed it.
>
>> I've attached a new cygcheck output (-svr) as you suggested. =A0One thin=
g I
>> noted was that the uname -a output says I have Cygwin 1.7.1 and this
>> confuses me. =A0I've updated on a regular basis and reboot whenever the
>> installation requests me to do so. =A0I should have the 1.7.7-1 release.
>> =A0The
>> cygcheck seems to have differing 1.7* information. =A0Is there some magic
>> translation I need to know of to get the correct release number?
>
> No, if it's reporting 1.7.1, I expect that's the version you're running.
> And I expect that's coming into play here. =A0But go ahead and double che=
ck
> it in the Windows explorer. =A0I expect you'll find it reports 1.7.1 too.
>
> This is a problem. =A0I expect you know that you need to stop all your
> services before an upgrade in order to get the new DLL moved into place
> immediately, right? =A0If you don't do this, it will queue up the move for
> next reboot. =A0My guess is you've rebooted at least once since installing
> 1.7.x > 1.7.1 but it's possible things have gotten gummed up if you didn't
> and have since done other upgrades (that's pure theory though). =A0What's
> not is that you have ZoneAlarm installed that is known to cause problems.
> I'd recommend unstalling it, stopping all Cygwin services (cron, cygserve=
r,
> httpd2, and sshd), reinstall the Cygwin package, and then restart the
> services. =A0You should find this process gives you a current cygwin1.dll
> in '/bin'. =A0If not, we need to look at the results of the installation
> process (and/or for <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#3PP> ).
>
> --
> Larry Hall =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0htt=
p://www.rfk.com
> RFK Partners, Inc. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(508) 893-9=
779 - RFK Office
> 216 Dalton Rd. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(508) 8=
93-9889 - FAX
> Holliston, MA 01746
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> A: Yes.
>>
>> Q: Are you sure?
>>>
>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>>
>>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
>
> --
> Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

I'm pretty convinced there's something going on (or NOT going on...)
during the upgrade process.  I've seen this report of someone doing a
setup and still having an old cygwin1.dll, it's happened to me (see
thread regarding svn metadata name mangling), and I've had someone
email me about the name mangling issue (who didn't want to post to the
list) discover he had a downlevel version of the cygwin1.dll file
also.

There's also the additional evidence of finding a half dozen or so
files ending in .new /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.  Perhaps Microsoft had a
hotfix or somesuch that might have affected Cygwin when it needs to do
a replace files on boot thing.  I have no idea how that's implemented,
so that's speculation, of course.

--jc

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple