X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Subject: Re: ocaml: patches needed
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F718711-595B-44C5-B2A8-61CF29BA00A4@inria.fr>
References: <1439640916.139526.1286812910597.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>	 <3F718711-595B-44C5-B2A8-61CF29BA00A4@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:51 -0500
Message-ID: <1286982891.2656.2.camel@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:47 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't
> implement the full upstream package.  What I will do instead is:
> 
> ocaml-base   for the system except camlp4
> ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4
> ocaml        an empty helper package that depends on ocaml-base and ocaml-camlp4
> 
> I'm not sure what to name the base package: it could be ocaml-base or
> ocaml-core.  Is there a generally-accepted naming convention for such
> cases?

No, but Debian uses ocaml-base, so I'd suggest that.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple