From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: emacs-23.2-3 and DBus
References: <844od1b8rx.fsf@aol.com> <4CAB2230.4090500@cornell.edu>	<877hhwiih3.fsf@gmx.de> <4CAB84CF.2010604@cornell.edu>	<8739skhs26.fsf@gmx.de> <4CAC73AF.1020209@cornell.edu>	<87ocb7mlhq.fsf@gmx.de> <4CACB32F.2070501@cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:51:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4CACB32F.2070501@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown's message of "Wed, 06	Oct 2010 13:34:39 -0400")
Message-ID: <87y6abgqg3.fsf@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu> writes:

>> The binary has the following checksum:
>>
>> $ cksum /usr/bin/emacs
>> 658187514 16254990 /usr/bin/emacs
>
> That's not actually the binary; it's a symlink that resolves to either
> /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe or /usr/bin/emacs-nox.exe, depending on whether
> or not you've installed the emacs-X11 package.  Is it possible that
> you upgraded the emacs package but are still using an old emacs-X11?
> If not, I don't know what the problem could be.  If you can't figure
> it out, you could try giving the command
>
>   cygcheck -svr > cygcheck.out
>
> and sending the resulting cygcheck.out as an attachment.  Maybe I (or
> someone) will be able to spot something.

I haven't the cygwin notebook with me, next access for me is tomorrow.
I'll check then.

The only difference I could imagine is that I haven't started the system
bus; only the session bus was running. Could you, please, check with
your environment? Maybe there is still a problem.

> Ken

Best regards, Michael.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple