X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4CABEE3C.5090006@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:34:20 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: OpenCV: (Re: trouble posting to cygwin-apps) References: <4CAA3A16.1000103@kitware.com> <4CAB8EA9.8020104@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <1286317862.8828.337.camel@YAAKOV04> In-Reply-To: <1286317862.8828.337.camel@YAAKOV04> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 10/5/2010 6:31 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > BTW, you do know that Ports includes an OpenCV build? Of course it > requires Ports' CMake: > > http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ports;a=tree;f=graphics/opencv > ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/release-2/opencv > > Please let me know if this somehow does not suffice. Yep, I'm using your version -- the only problem (it's not really a *problem*, per se) is, I have to rebuild it myself because the cygwin-ports version has a LOT of dependencies on other cygwin-ports packages. I don't need video stream handling, so I can drop all those requirements (like ffmpeg, etc). I'm trying to avoid "polluting" my installation with whole bunch of cygwin-ports packages, since that might "pollute" official builds of other packages I maintain. Yeah, I know I could have multiple cygwin installs to keep them separate, but... FYI, I also had to rebuild the cygwin-ports cmake from your -src package. When I installed the cygwin-ports binary package, cmake simply exited without doing anything -- but I don't see any missing DLLs in the cygcheck output. I suspect the issue is that you have built most of cygwin-ports using the beta gcc-4.5 (and, the new binaries require the libgcc1 DLL from 4.5). Again, I don't want to "pollute" my package maintenance installation with a beta compiler (or its runtime), so... -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple