X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <46A06B8E364A45CB95D16BCD109D88D0@multiplay.co.uk>
References: <AANLkTimP2TqucKt075ZyfTOMzEByUEUboBTz5V-SVEwX@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTi=uFBTQkY6BP03PO2+wsBeOVDitF0CNyLBDj-3C@mail.gmail.com>	<4C938040.3080704@cwilson.fastmail.fm>	<AANLkTi=ONi+XPUx9z3K2yEVq_28QP+yV1Y2sue3vH7w2@mail.gmail.com>	<20100918214807.GA29546@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<46A06B8E364A45CB95D16BCD109D88D0@multiplay.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:46:15 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTiknrO+MAzZaaBqhNWTLquV8NDq=kc8V08-icbTP@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: simplifying rebaseall
From: Al <oss.elmar@googlemail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> I'd beg to differ; I'd suggest it is, as suggested by the OP,
> actually quite a common use. You only have to look at the use of
> say perl and you will have users quite regularly compiling their
> own DLL's as they install modules via CPAN, and this is quite painful
> due to all the issues it can present with rebase.
>
> While I love cygwin, I must say that its supporting community can
> be very dismissive of its users to the point of alienating potential
> contributors. I myself has have experienced this on several occasions
> and have ended up finding myself not raising issues that affect us
> daily for fear of being shot down for no more reason that someone
> doesn't "think" its import to fix or should "work" that way anyway
> or even doesn't like the way you structured you post.
>
> To reiterate I still think that developers deserve much respect
> and thanks for all the effort they put in, but a little more open
> mindedness and approachability like that which can be found in other
> open source communities such as SFU and FreeBSD wouldn't go a miss
> sometimes ;-)
>
> =A0 Regards
> =A0 Steve
>

thanks

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

