X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:55:03 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: simplifying rebaseall
Message-ID: <20100917185503.GB22619@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <AANLkTi=uFBTQkY6BP03PO2+wsBeOVDitF0CNyLBDj-3C@mail.gmail.com> <4C938040.3080704@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4C9389EA.7050704@cygwin.com> <AANLkTi=mGAdGLR_cMRZuXYQB-T9qxVcDNm7hQxpbcDwN@mail.gmail.com> <4C939F7A.1020902@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <AANLkTinwOhJjYZw0L-5qw8rhgzHxPF6qG2_HCQTzayY6@mail.gmail.com> <20100917174951.GD3503@jethro.local.lan> <AANLkTinFAySYoyu++KZ-steS6hJ=Bj11Yd=BB8TT+wKh@mail.gmail.com> <20100917182513.GC22223@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTimZBGGfY02r4fzSdMvGkKTQ4MgoHrHj4p1mkW6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimZBGGfY02r4fzSdMvGkKTQ4MgoHrHj4p1mkW6g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:49:04PM +0200, Al wrote:
>>
>> This discussion seems to boil down to "Someone should add words about
>> rebaseall to the FAQ".
>>
>
>If words to the FAQ, then:
>
>1.) a matching header
>2.) including link to the readme
>3.) including the famous error messages people enter into the search machines:
>
> *** fatal error - unable to remap to same address as parent :
>
>Then I see some chances that it is found.

Hmm.  Still no actual *words*.  Just the usual propounding.

But, yes, if someone does volunteer to write a FAQ entry it should
actually be informative.  Sorry I didn't make that clear.

Next?

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

