X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:43:04 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <991010419.20100824094304@mtu-net.ru> To: Gregg Levine , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Building a custom cygwin1.dll library In-Reply-To: References: <20100822063050.GA29569@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C72C3EB.7080106@veritech.com> <20100824013716.GA4807@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Greetings, Gregg Levine! > At the moment I am only asking. I've downloaded the snaps from the > past two days, haven't used them, and simply asked these questions. > Chris, I only asked, I don't want to add, or subtract any features. Yet again, why do you want to (re)build cygwin1.dll in first place? Out of pure curiosity? The complication level of this task seems irrational to me. > As for newlib..... That's the part I am thinking about. It's the way > the whole business might or might not interact with the idiotic way > Microsoft does things. Not related. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@freemail.ru) 24.08.2010, <9:41> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple