X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:42:57 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bug tracker
Message-ID: <20100819174257.GF9090@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4C6C1B01.4020808@blunn.org> <20100818182641.GB22698@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C6C4372.2070701@blunn.org> <20100818205009.GK11340@calimero.vinschen.de> <4C6D17E0.5010506@blunn.org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi@4ax.com> <i0jq661rqt8e1e1vngca13d75svs67qon1@4ax.com> <20100819170553.GB20290@calimero.vinschen.de> <hlpq6616b81dl2l21a9lfcven3b1q6nkbv@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <hlpq6616b81dl2l21a9lfcven3b1q6nkbv@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:26:03PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>>On Aug 19 11:23, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>>>What is the status of http://cygwin.com/bugzilla?  It appears to have
>>>been in use at least last year.
>>>
>>>Provisional effort?  Occasionally used?  Useful, not useful?
>>
>>Not used for Cygwin, right now.
>
>CGF was using it at least a little bit last year:
>http://cygwin.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10928 .  But it doesn't seem
>to be used much.
>
>That installation appears to be for everything in sourceware.org, with
>a few Cygwin categories.  It's too hard to use for Cygwin in that form,
>IMO.  I guess I need to talk to the sourceware admins about whether a
>separate instance could be provided for Cygwin.

I'm one of the sourceware admins.

We're not going to set up a separate bugzilla entry for Cygwin, or at
least we won't be doing it until I'm convinced this is actually going to
fly.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple