X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:42:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies Message-ID: <20100818204205.GB4755@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4C6C1B01.4020808@blunn.org> <20100818182641.GB22698@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C6C4372.2070701@blunn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C6C4372.2070701@blunn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:32:50PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the >>>ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process >>>for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more >>>relevant set of people. >>> >>Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package. > >Ahhhh I see. It's /defined/ to be mediocre. For *you*, since you've decided to be insulting, you can actually expect less-than-mediocre handling of your problems, this being a volunteer process and human nature being what it is and all. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple