X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Existence check fails on Cygwin Perl Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:01:09 -0700 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <010016E11294264BB30D58894AB4040D02B1FE18@de010369.de.ina.com> <20100817090627.GA16800@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9pre) Gecko/20100815 Lightning/1.0b2 Lanikai/3.1.3pre In-Reply-To: <20100817090627.GA16800@calimero.vinschen.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 08/17/2010 02:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I can't reproduce, but I'm already running Cygwin 1.7.6. I have a vague > memory that we already had a report along these lines and that I patched > this at one point... I *think* that's what is successfully hidden > behind the "Fix erroneous handling of devices in path checking." message > in the announcement... > > > Corinna > Oh fudge! Great. You know corp America - always back a few versions! They'll never get up to the newest version of Cygwin before my contract runs out! But thanks, I guess it's time for me to update Cygwin again... I knew it would come does to something in Cygwin's handling of such UNC paths. -- Andrew DeFaria I was thinking that women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple