X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Mark Geisert <mark@maxrnd.com>
Subject: Re: fork() unbearable in VM guest
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:16:08 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <loom.20100816T070502-24@post.gmane.org>
References: <4C68194B.1070409@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Daniel Colascione writes:
> I'm running Cygwin in a fresh 32-bit Windows 7 VirtualBox guest (on an
> OS X code) --- and performance is even more unbearable than usual: each
> process spawned from bash takes about 800ms; on my Windows 7 64-bit box,
> I get at least 8-9 forks per second.
> 
> Any idea what could be wrong?

You mean, besides the additional layer of emulation?  You are comparing apples
to oranges in more ways than one.

..mark


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple