Message-ID: <4C6456E8.4080808@apconsult.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:17:44 +0200
From: DaveLaw <cygwin@apconsult.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: CygWin Security & Performance Issues
References: <201008121351.o7CDp56h018152@post.webmailer.de> <20100812140244.GH14202@calimero.vinschen.de> <7359-1281637768-267998@sneakemail.com> <20100812191551.GD26062@trikaliotis.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100812191551.GD26062@trikaliotis.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

  Maybe the co-leader of the project should channel her efforts into 
just that,
rather than getting peoples backs up with unnecessary nitpicking about
how she thinks they should structure their emails.

Best Regards,
DaveLaw

On 12.08.2010 21:15, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> * On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:29:27PM -0400 Robert Jacobson wrote:
>> On 8/12/2010 10:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen  wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I'll not waste my time and reply to you another time.  That makes
>>> both of us happy.
>> Is this what passes for professional behavior at Red Hat?
> You mean, the co-leader of the project should let herself be insulted
> from a person who got his answers, but did not even give a thank you?
> Note also that this is the "open" Cygwin list. That is, this is not a
> paid support channel. I would consider it more like some people give
> advice for free, and not necessarily with the hat of Red Hat.
>
> I'll go back in lurk mode again...
>
> Regards,
> Spiro.
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple