X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:11:19 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Request for feature: more flexible setup routine
Message-ID: <20100727191118.GD3387@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <30EAF1C130A74F97AC4C82B42ED55DAE@hometoshiba> <20100725025446.GA17000@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTik0XnKsCvq_moPP60Dm95qvnDcm8346+01EaHyt@mail.gmail.com> <1179889566.20100726133244@mtu-net.ru> <AANLkTi=CGdn6n2LQ5h6M7rTsDL8-949ZvZQ3oR==C1dY@mail.gmail.com> <20100726142944.GA28399@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTikPv8YSQz=j=xjmM2bi_UkLmzCKHvBVbvDUpaVX@mail.gmail.com> <20100726170943.GB28592@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTim1CwRTmFC192xD78GsJ5S=C8T1M-2RcJMgsBuU@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim1CwRTmFC192xD78GsJ5S=C8T1M-2RcJMgsBuU@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 26 July 2010 18:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> If we wanted to do something like this I think it would have to be a
>>>> separate dialog where the user makes a decision about what they want.
>>>> Either that or a list of packages to update would always be presented
>>>> so that people wouldn't be surprised.
>>>
>>>Agreed, but of course that'd need substantial design and
>>>implementation work, so realistically it isn't gonna happen.
>>
>> AFAIK, the latter, where a list of what's being updated is shown isn't a
>> substantial redesign.
>
>Can you elaborate? Do you mean adding a new screen before the package
>selection screen?

No, a screen after the package selection which shows all of the packages
which are being installed - which is, I guess, basically what is now
(until your rename change goes live) the "Partial" view.

That's how linux package managers do it.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

