X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <246529.11895.qm@web25502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:41:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: cmake and fortran To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <1278710852.7240.4.camel@YAAKOV04> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com --- Ven 9/7/10, Yaakov ha scritto: > Marco Atzeri wrote: > > as lapack is moving to cmake as build system, > > I started to playing with cmake and I suspect no one > > tried before cmake and fortran together on cygwin. > >=20 > > The definition file > > > /usr/share/cmake-2.6.4/Modules/Platform/CYGWIN-g77.cmake > > is clearly wrong. It tries to build libxxx.dll and so > on. > >=20 > > Attached the one that I am currently using, copied and > modified > > from CYGWIN-g77.cmake that seems right. > >=20 > > Could the cmake maintainer give a check and eventually >=20 > > report the issue upstream ? >=20 > I'm not the cmake maintainer, but could you try Ports' > cmake-2.8.1-11 > and see if that's any better? >=20 >=20 > Yaakov 2.8.1-11 looks much better. I see that the same structure is used for all GNU compiler on /usr/share/cmake-2.8.1/Modules/Platform CYGWIN-GNU-C.cmake=20=20=20=20 CYGWIN-GNU-Fortran.cmake=20=20 CYGWIN-GNU-CXX.cmake=20=20 all refer to common structure in CYGWIN-GNU.cmake Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple