Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:54:59 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygport cross compile(r) support [was: Re: cygport patch: suppress libtool fixup step]
Message-ID: <20100709165459.GB25913@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <1278402537.5784.8.camel@YAAKOV04> <4C337C6E.2080003@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <1278455320.4032.49.camel@YAAKOV04> <4C33EEC1.9050600@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <1278519024.1096.90.camel@YAAKOV04> <4C34D3BF.7020404@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <1278548055.6960.59.camel@YAAKOV04> <4C3534E6.90505@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <1278560355.6960.114.camel@YAAKOV04> <4C35E1E1.1080906@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C35E1E1.1080906@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:34:09AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>On 7/7/2010 11:39 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 22:16 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> Hmm. That's what I *was* doing: JonY's -src provides a cygport that
>
>> I didn't mean the .cygport(5), I meant cygport(1).  The goal is to make
>> these workarounds unnecessary.
>
>Sure. There's three "status levels" of cygport support for any desired
>behavior:

I'm getting whiplash trying to read about these issues in cygwin-apps and
cygwin.  If Yaakov doesn't mind, I'd like to make discussions of cygport
on-topic in cygwin-apps.  It's sort of been that way for a while now anyway.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple