X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:33:11 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: rebaseall [1.7]: cyggcc_s-1.dll error Message-ID: <20100629143311.GK8163@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <725017.86833.qm@web25504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4C29FF54.2040408@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C29FF54.2040408@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Jun 29 08:12, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/29/2010 08:09 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >> Phooey. dash now depends on cyggcc_s-1.dll, so > >> rebaseall needs to be > >> taught to add this library to the list of exemptions > >> (similar to > >> cygwin1.dll). > > > > I doubt it > > $ cygcheck ./dash.exe > > C:\cygwin2\bin\dash.exe > > C:\cygwin2\bin\cygwin1.dll > > C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.DLL > > C:\WINDOWS\system32\KERNEL32.dll > > C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll > > C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll > > C:\WINDOWS\system32\Secur32.dll > > Rerun setup.exe. As of yesterday[1], dash DOES depend on cyggcc_s-1.dll: Is that really necessary? Wouldn't it make sense to link dash against static libgcc? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple