X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100609194905.GA4064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <1276042636.1651.9.camel@erebor> <AANLkTil6fa2-stL9f3hd-Dg-X6FjzVKLeG56lPoI7OYp@mail.gmail.com> 	<20100609044034.GB9305@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTikJ9U3U49HlT9Ldm6aueX3z22gN_6L95P-E2Pwz@mail.gmail.com> 	<AANLkTinrgelZ5PcMhWjzehe8sa-cjkGoiFI8WpLGNh84@mail.gmail.com> 	<AANLkTimh8Kzu14RAhlzYl6FBl6nOdXNY2JMIug7b_v-X@mail.gmail.com> 	<4C0F9535.7010902@redhat.com> <AANLkTinO8GJY9d9SIy-unGW1yrPqGjvNmo5oj5-t2zsC@mail.gmail.com> 	<20100609154734.GA18851@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTilC07LTlo9kMfDzbguKhZB1-aeARIzsQ8Ca3fDO@mail.gmail.com> 	<20100609194905.GA4064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
From: Julio Costa <costaju@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:21:58 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin42-T8ZoErk-UMWlPckn5sRRF0U0ZWEbUKkUg1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 'cp' utility bug when <dest-name>.exe file exist.
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 20:49, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:28:16PM +0100, Julio Costa wrote:
>>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 16:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:02:16PM +0100, Julio Costa wrote:
>>>>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 14:20, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you ever encountered a makefile that doesn't consistently use
>>>>> $(EXEEXT) everywhere? ??Too many people just expect 'gcc -o foo ...' =
to
>>>>> produce foo, then 'strip foo' to work, without realizing that on cygw=
in,
>>>>> gcc created 'foo.exe' and strip _has_ to have .exe magic.
>>>>
>>>>That's just one of the several scenarios which would greatly benefit
>>>>from a removal of .exe magic.
>>>
>>> Uh, no. ??That would BREAK makefiles.
>>>
>>
>>Huh? I'm getting dense. My reading was:
>>
>>if gcc (or cygwin with his magic) did't apply the .exe extension, then
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0{strip,cp,mv,install,etc...} wouldn't need the .exe magic
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0period.
>>else
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0strip&company _do_ need the .exe magic
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0# ...and possibily because of that, some Makefiles were nee=
dlessly
>>modified to do his own magic
>>end if
>>
>>So, what would break?
>
> Any makefile which didn't use the absolute latest version of gcc which
> has this critically important change to remove .exe.
>

How come? I thought that that kind of things was handled by an regular
autoconf, which tries to see what is the result of a gcc
compilation... (the a.out test)

> For the record, unless Corinna thinks it's a good idea (which I doubt):
> we're not going to change Cygwin to drop all of the .exe extensions from
> every single file in the distribution and I'd be violently opposed to
> the notion of changing gcc's default behavior after all of these years.
>

Well, here you have two unbeatable arguments:
1) violence
2) after all these years

That is quite enough to make your point.
After all, WJM, right?

I rest my case.

--=20
___________
Julio Costa

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple