X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4C0DF735.1020203@12000.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:54:29 -0700
From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org>
Reply-To: nma@12000.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: bug report: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too 	smal
References: <20100604083653.GA6401@calimero.vinschen.de>	<4C08CAE9.2000507@12000.org>	<4C08D2B8.8090609@12000.org>	<4C0C685A.1010803@x-ray.at>	<4C0C83D5.3070705@12000.org>	<AANLkTilfLX5QpbvWAg3zqOOthsRGgLF3N0ganwgzkEa9@mail.gmail.com>	<4C0CB1AE.8030902@12000.org>	<4C0D3F16.6090307@12000.org>	<20100607194146.GA31697@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<4C0D4FB7.7060307@12000.org>	<20100607201507.GA5183@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<4C0D57CD.1030908@12000.org>	<4C0D60DE.4040101@cygwin.com>	<4C0D9381.3080506@12000.org>	<4C0DA501.8050402@cwilson.fastmail.fm>	<4C0DAD7C.2090007@12000.org> <AANLkTilt8j_pFoDy9ttJzk4CUVRGQcjwAVIoP5ZCZDYC@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilt8j_pFoDy9ttJzk4CUVRGQcjwAVIoP5ZCZDYC@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 6/8/2010 12:46 AM, Alexander T wrote:
> There is a similar post from 2009 where the conclusion is that this
> can be caused by very deep forking
> (http://readlist.com/lists/cygwin.com/cygwin/6/34359.html). Is it
> possible that the make script does very deep, or is stuck in infinite,
> recursion?

Yes, I know, I saw the above, and I did point that message when I first 
reported the problem:

http://readlist.com/lists/cygwin.com/cygwin/8/44577.html

May be then this bug has been there for a year now.

--Nasser

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

