X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 01:04:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New Mintty Beta via setup Message-ID: <20100606050429.GB31202@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4C0ACB3B.7090201@veritech.com> <4C0ACD45.8050601@veritech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:21:42AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: >Lee Rothstein wrote: >>> On my sys, uninstalled the old one, and installed nada, zilch, niemands, >>> zip, bupkis, nothing, the null set. > >For some reason, when the test version is selected in setup.exe, the >checkbox in the 'Bin?' (as in "Binary", rather than a British waste >container) column gets cleared, which indeed means you get nuffing. So >make sure to tick that checkbox. > >(Is this a setup.exe bug? Something wrong about the packaging?) I forgot to mention that I believe you have to check the "Exp" box at the top. It is far from optimal UI to have to do this, though, IMO. So, yeah, if you want to say that's a bug, I'm inclined to agree. But, anyway, cygcheck says I have the latest version, along with a handful of other beta packages that setup.exe was kind enough to install for me. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple