X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C094B0D.5010406@cs.umass.edu>
References: <4C03D6C5.4050004@x-ray.at>	<80373222dd5d43b134a5ede7036e7674.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<20100602080626.GV16885@calimero.vinschen.de>	<383c8b44a088dad09a0b77d3299feda7.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<20100602174848.GA14172@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<e13dc87c8ea561acfd167ec92bb737cf.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<20100603235944.GA12167@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<c2b0024257b44cff37a8f24b4c592f1b.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<20100604024422.GB12167@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<78e7b77657c0cfcd63dc22ad9679bc85.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<20100604045807.GC12167@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<2570318aabfa537bf24c8d3a55f9dcd4.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<4C092F96.5040800@cygwin.com>	<7a1785a5f0a1d0a8956cd10e573f2e53.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>	<4C094B0D.5010406@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 19:58:29 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3oKbQKqsl9Vy9LwLbXv5L6CIrC4prX7JWiky5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()
From: Andy Koppe <andy.koppe@gmail.com>
To: moss@cs.umass.edu, cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 4 June 2010 19:50, Eliot Moss wrote:
> I don't think there's an objection here to
> patching *rsync* specially in the cygwin
> environment -- that would be between you
> and the rsync port maintainer. The issue
> is whether or not to make a more general
> change to cygwin itself, and cgf is just
> saying that that's hard to do.
>
> Conceivably we could come up with some
> additional functions that cygwin ports
> could use if they want to, but "out of
> box" use of stat needs to replicate
> full behavior since there's no way to
> know what a given call of stat really
> needs ...

MKS has such a faster but limited version of stat:

http://www.mkssoftware.com/docs/man3/_NutFastStat.3.asp

Shame about the name.

Andy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

