X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:48:48 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat() Message-ID: <20100602174848.GA14172@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20100530170747.GA8605@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C03D6C5.4050004@x-ray.at> <80373222dd5d43b134a5ede7036e7674.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> <20100602080626.GV16885@calimero.vinschen.de> <383c8b44a088dad09a0b77d3299feda7.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <383c8b44a088dad09a0b77d3299feda7.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:46:03AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: >Thanks for the pointer, I just gave it a whirl, it actually didn't make >much of a difference. > >I am going to start looking into making a patch. Let me point out that the kind of slowdown that you are seeing is not something that I would consider acceptable. So what I'd like to see is an analysis of *why* Cygwin is so slow rather than a band-aid which uses an environment variable or different api to work around a real problem. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple