X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100518172806.GA21055@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <838w7hnm7t.fsf@garydjones.name> <20100518191641.GA2472@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 21:29:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand From: Berthold Barth To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Berthold Barth wrote: >> To reiterate, I am not interested in collaborating with anyone on web >> site redesign and, as I said, I don't think a mascot is called for. =A0By >> mascot, I mean an image displayed on the web site. > > If that is your opinion about what is best for Cygwin and the > community then as a core maintainer, it is of course your > prerogative to deny any kind of design improvement. At least I tried. Sorry for the split post, I have no idea how that happened. Cheers, Berthold -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple