X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SARE_RMML_Stock10,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com connect(): No such file or directory From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:18:28 -0400 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > Could Christopher and/or Corinna please weigh in on this? There seem to be > a lot of ideas and energy behind this project, but I don't think the > discussion can go much further until we hear from them. > > Is either of you interested in having a redesign of cygwin.com? What would > be your criteria for an acceptable redesign? The silence is deafening, and a bit dispiriting. My reading of the list traffic on this question is there's broad agreement that a redesign is overdue and would provide a nice benefit to the project. All we have to do is make some decisions about what we want, and we have kind offers of help to make it so. But I don't think we can proceed without some buy-in from the project co-maintainers. If they don't want it or don't like the result, it'll go nowhere and be wasted effort. So my questions remain. Christopher and Corinna, if you don't think a redesign is a good idea, then please tell us that. Thanks, Andrew. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple