X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Brent Kerr Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 21:21:33 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin visual brand To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Hi, Klaus, thanks for your feedback on my sample site (http://cygwin.codecamel.com). Further information about why/what/how can be found in my message on the original thread (http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-03/msg00744.html), so I won't go into it again on this one. > A few months ago somebody on this list offered an appealing redesign > of the Cygwin.com website. [1][2] That, unfortunately, seems to have > gone nowhere (unless something is happening behind the scenes). Nothing is happening behind the scenes (that involves me). I'm a HTML/CSS standards & accessibility developer so my design ability is relatively limited, but I'm happy to incorporate any ideas or work with a graphic designer if I'm asked to. However, I feel that a site such as cygwin.com doesn't need anything fancy. It should simply be clear, easy to update and standards compliant. Also, I agree the name "setup.exe" could be improved so perhaps a new thread should be made for that. Cheers, Brent -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple